In Brief

In Australian Fast Foods Pty Ltd v Kameel Pty Ltd [2021] VCAT 921, VCAT determined that a Valuer nominated by the VSBC as a specialist retail valuer, is a specialist retail valuer and it is up to the party challenging the appointment to prove that the valuer does not have the requisite experience.

What you need to know

If you are a valuer and selected by the VSBC to determine a rent, it will be difficult for a party to challenge your credentials. To do so, it will need to prove that the valuer is not sufficiently experienced to undertake the task of valuing the premises. This will be difficult to achieve.

Background

In the current matter, it is apparent that the landlord did not want the rent to be valued, due to 3 previous valuers been rejected by the landlord.

The landlord tried to object to the 4th valuer being appointed, on the basis that the valuer did not have the requisite experience to undertake the valuation. The landlord argued that it was a matter for the tenant to prove that the 4th valuer had the requisite experience to undertake the valuation. VCAT rejected this argument. VCAT also approved the appointment of the valuer by VSBC.

The landlord also had the 4th valuer appear at the hearing to express the valuer's credentials. VCAT ordered that the landlord pay the valuer's costs for attending VCAT.

Conclusion

The VCAT decision should give valuers some comfort that the valuer's appointment is difficult to successfully challenge.

About the Author

Rohan Ingleton

Partner
A telecommunications and retail leasing expert, Rohan is a property specialist with an enviable reputation.

Latest Knowledge

Practical tips to deal with the recent defamation judgment in the High Court

Practical tips to deal with the recent defamation judgment in the High Court

n a recent case the majority of the High Court held that news outlets can be considered publishers of comments posted by third parties (members of the public) and under articles on the news site’s Facebook page for the purpose...
21 September, 2021
Valuer and Retail Leases Update: Another Valuation set aside

Valuer and Retail Leases Update: Another Valuation set aside

In the decision of Steambrook Pty Ltd v Boulton (Building and Property) [2021] VCAT 996, the rental determination issued on 2 July 2020 was set aside for not complying with section 37 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). The...
21 September, 2021
7-Eleven franchisee successful in obtaining an injunction against the franchisor

7-Eleven franchisee successful in obtaining an injunction against the franchisor

In a recent Supreme Court of Victoria case, a 7-Eleven franchisee was successful in obtaining an injunction proceeding against the franchisor. The Defendant leased the property for a store in Heathmont for a period of 10 years with an option...
21 September, 2021