In brief

In the decision of Phillips v Abel (Building and Property) [2019] VCAT 1031, VCAT determined that a quarry was governed by the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (‘Act’).

What you need to know

In granting a lease for a quarry, or other vacant land, this can still be subject to the Act. Importantly, land tax will not be payable by the tenant. Please ensure that in granting any such lease or reviewing any such rent, consideration is given as to whether the Act applies.

Background

VCAT found that most of the sand, gravel and clay extracted from the leased land, was used by customers for their own purposes such as making other products or using it on their own properties. VCAT found that a retail business could be conducted on bare land, including a car park, horse agistment or a racetrack. The Act does not limit retail premises to buildings. The Act looks at the purpose of occupation, namely whether retail goods and services are provided rather than the character of the premises.

Conclusion

The ambit of the Act has expanded and careful consideration needs to be given as to whether a lease is governed by the Act.

About the Author

Rohan Ingleton

Partner
A telecommunications and retail leasing expert advising a top Australian telecommunications provider, Rohan is a property specialist with an enviable reputation.

Related News

Valuer and Retail Leases Update – Can you make a lease a retail lease?

Whether or not a lease is governed by the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) is a matter of law and landlords and tenants cannot make (or not make) a lease retail simply by agreement.
Read more

“A rose by any other name” A refresher – franchisee licences could be retail leases

In preparing franchisee licences, the parties will need to turn their minds to whether the arrangement substantively amounts to a retail lease.
Read more