After putting collections on hold during the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has returned to recovering debts, including issuing Director Penalty Notices (DPN’s). However, in a recent change enacted by the ATO, directors are no longer able to avoid personal liability for a penalty pursuant to a DPN by entering into a payment arrangement with the ATO.

It appears the ATO may be seeking to deter the practice of directors avoiding personal liability for a company’s tax debt by negotiating a payment plan with the ATO, thereby keeping the liability with the company (and not with the director).

Previously, directors who had been served with a DPN could discharge their personal liability for the debt by any one of the following options (entered into within the 21-day period):

  1. the company discharging its tax liability by paying the amount outstanding;
  2. the company going into administration;
  3. the company going into liquidation; or
  4. entering into a payment arrangement with the ATO in accordance with section 255-15 in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth).

However, as a result of the recent changes to the DPN regime, the options now available to director are as follows:

  1. the company discharging its tax liability by paying the amount outstanding;
  2. the company going into administration;
  3. the company going into liquidation; or
  4. the company appointing a small business restructuring practitioner (SBRP).

Essentially, a SBRP is a format of insolvency appointment which can be described as a simplified debt restructuring or voluntary administration process intended to better serve small businesses.

The result of these changes to the DPN regime will likely be more companies being put into administration and/or liquidation.

We suggest that company directors ensure they confirm and update their personal address kept on record with ASIC as this is where a DPN will be sent. Once delivered, a director must act on a DPN within 21 days of the date of the notice which, considering postage delays in recent years, may leave very little time for a director to act.

Contact Angelo Conti or Lisa McNicholas for more information or to discuss your own situation.

About the Author

Angelo Conti

Partner
Angelo has acted in a number of high-profile corporate collapses and is an experienced insolvency practitioner with a commercial outlook who takes a holistic approach in determining the best course of action.

Lisa McNicholas

Senior Associate
Highly experienced in insolvency and commercial litigation, Lisa is a well connected lawyer who creates tailor-made approaches to achieve successful and commercially minded outcomes for her clients.

Latest Knowledge

Fair Work Reforms 2024: The Second Wave

Tim Greenall summarises the key changes employers need to know about, helping to ensure your business remains compliant with the new obligations.
27 March, 2024

Unyielding tax obligations: Understanding tax debt write-offs

John Miller provides clarity around when a tax debt is considered "uneconomical to pursue," and the potential future implications for taxpayers with historical tax debts.
18 March, 2024

Fair Work Commission rejects first employee request for flexible working arrangement

FWC rejects an an employees' appeal for flexible work arrangement.
17 January, 2024