We are regularly engaged to assist directors and shareholders who are engaged in disputes, often where there is a 50/50 deadlock, as the interests in the business are equally owned (whether as shareholders or beneficiaries of a trust).

Often the parties in question are related or are long-term friends, which makes the dispute more complicated as emotions run deep. It is not uncommon for these disputes to resemble a ‘family law’ type dispute between two partners. Indeed, the emotions and accusations that are often made are in many respects very similar to a family law separation.

Because of the historical relationships involved, there is a natural tendency of the parties to exhaust much time and energy trying to resolve the dispute themselves instead of calling in independent professionals. Whilst there is nothing wrong with this approach, parties often get caught up in the emotional aspects of the dispute, neglecting the underlying business and its assets which can be seriously impacted during this time.

Much time is often wasted (in some cases, over a year or more), and when either party eventually engages a lawyer, opportunities to resolve the matter on a more favourable commercial outcome are sometimes lost. This includes properties being mortgaged and assets otherwise being depleted or transferred to entities beyond the reach of the aggrieved party.

Where the dispute involves serious allegations of impropriety, fraud, breaches of directors’ duties or oppressive conduct, acting sooner rather than later could make a significant difference to the ultimate outcome for the innocent parties seeking a quick financial resolution. Strategic opportunities to protect the business and assets or pursue a recovery may be lost because of the delay; assets may have been transferred to another jurisdiction (such as overseas) making them more difficult or even impossible to recover, and solutions such as injunctive relief to freeze assets and possibly appoint a receiver, manager or provisional liquidator may also become more challenging.

We are seeing this more and more where the parties in question do not speak English and sometimes believe that it is better to try and resolve the dispute using cultural mechanisms rather than engaging lawyers. By the time that these clients come to see us, they are often upset that they can no longer pursue a speedy recovery (or at all) and don’t understand that under the Australian legal system, taking pro-active steps sooner than later is often critical.

If you or one of your clients is involved in such a dispute or you would like to discuss your own situation in more detail, please reach out to Angelo Conti or Lisa McNicholas as soon as possible to help ensure that the best commercial outcome is achieved.

About the Author

Angelo Conti

Angelo has acted in a number of high-profile corporate collapses and is an experienced insolvency practitioner with a commercial outlook who takes a holistic approach in determining the best course of action.

Lisa McNicholas

Senior Associate
Highly experienced in insolvency and commercial litigation, Lisa is a well connected lawyer who creates tailor-made approaches to achieve successful and commercially minded outcomes for her clients.

Latest Knowledge

Fair Work Reforms 2024: The Second Wave

Tim Greenall summarises the key changes employers need to know about, helping to ensure your business remains compliant with the new obligations.
27 March, 2024

Unyielding tax obligations: Understanding tax debt write-offs

John Miller provides clarity around when a tax debt is considered "uneconomical to pursue," and the potential future implications for taxpayers with historical tax debts.
18 March, 2024

Fair Work Commission rejects first employee request for flexible working arrangement

FWC rejects an an employees' appeal for flexible work arrangement.
17 January, 2024