In a recent Federal Court case[1] the Court had to consider whether a liquidator was entitled to an extension of time to bring proceedings pursuant to section 588FF(1) of the Corporations Act due to COVID-19.

Facts

  • The liquidator had public examinations listed which were cancelled by the Court due to COVID-19.
  • The liquidator wanted to extend the time to bring a claim against the director until after the public examination had taken place.

Legal Principles

In considering this application the Court considered the following:

  • The liquidator’s explanation for the delay for not taking action within the 3 year period.
  • Any likely prejudice which would be suffered.
  • The merits of any such case – this does not apply if the purpose of the extension of time is to allow the liquidator time in which to properly decide whether or not to bring the proceedings.

The Court held that if it were not for the cancellation of the examination, the liquidator would have been in a position to complete his investigations and would have made the decision prior to the expiry of the three year period.

Should the liquidator have served the application for extension of time on the potential defendant (in this case the director)?

Yes – the Court in this case allowed time for the liquidator to serve the director of the company with the application and make submissions to the Court (which the director declined to do in this case).

Tips

  • Do not make the application in the last week of the three year period – the Court finds this extremely frustrating.
  • Serve all parties who may wish to make submissions on the matter (including any potential defendant).
  • Explain the delay – if the liquidator has sat on their hands or had a long period of time where nothing of substance occurred, then the Court will not allow the extension.

Conclusion

Where there is a good reason (such as being impeded by COVID-19), the Court will allow an extension of the three year period for liquidators to bring certain claims.

 

[1] Dudley, in the matter of Freshwater Bay Investments Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) [2021] FCA 608

About the Author

Catherine Ballantyne

Principal
Businesses rely on Catherine as a disputes specialist who will guide them through complex litigation, and who understands the commercial realities of being involved in a dispute.

Latest Knowledge

The importance of estate planning

In a world of increasing complexity, estate planning has become not merely prudent but essential. For individuals (and entities that they control) with significant assets, business interests or dependents, a properly structured estate plan is the cornerstone of long-term security,...
4 June, 2025

In a dispute with another shareholder? Here’s what you can do

In a dispute with another Shareholder? Here's what you can do. We are seeing a rise in shareholder disputes, unsurprising given the pressures many businesses face.
28 May, 2025

Fair Work Commission overrules employer rejection of flexible working arrangement

In a controversial decision, the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has overruled an employer decision to reject an employee request for a flexible working arrangement and ordered that the employer implement the employee's request for a flexible...
20 May, 2025