In Brief

In a recent case the majority of the High Court held that news outlets can be considered publishers of comments posted:

  1. by third parties (members of the public); and
  2. under articles on the news site’s Facebook page;

for the purpose of defamation law.

Although arguably this has been the case for some time, the High Court decision has focused attention again on defamation laws when posting on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Linkedin etc).

Why did the Court make this decision?

The Court held that:

  1. Any act of participation in the communication of defamatory matter to a third party may be sufficient to make a person a publisher.
  2. An administrator of the Facebook page could “hide” comments until they had been reviewed and then un-hidden if approved.
  3. The news outlets encouraged the comments - the number of comments is an important aspect of the Facebook page because it increases the profile and popularity of the page - in turn increasing the readership of the news site and their revenue.

The news sites had the ability to review and prevent from being seen by the public any defamatory comments.

Practical tips for users of social media

  1. If comments are not important for your business and can be turned off on your webpage / social media site – turn them off.
  2. If you have the ability to hide comments until they are reviewed by you – you should enliven this feature and carefully review comments before they can be seen.
  3. If you cannot hide comments on the social media platform you are using, then review the comments regularly and quickly delete any which may be considered defamatory.

It is also important to understand what constitutes defamation. My article at the link below outlines 6 things you need to know about defamation.

Six things you need to know about defamation

In the judgment of Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller; Nationwide News Pty Limited v Voller; Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Voller [2021] HCA 27

About the Author

Catherine Ballantyne

Partner
A business disputes specialist, Catherine is a trusted advisor to businesses and individuals in obtaining successful outcomes. Businesses rely on Catherine as a trusted advisor as well as lawyer in guiding them through complex litigation and disputes.

Latest Knowledge

Director Identification Numbers – important dates

Statutory demands are serious documents and should never be ignored.
4 April, 2022

Disputes between directors and shareholders and the importance of taking proactive steps early

We are regularly engaged to assist directors and shareholders who are engaged in disputes, often where there is a 50/50 deadlock, as the interests in the business are equally owned (whether as shareholders or beneficiaries of a trust). Often the...
25 March, 2022

Changes to Director Penalty Notices do not allow payment arrangements

After putting collections on hold during the depths of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has returned to recovering debts, including issuing Director Penalty Notices (DPN’s). However, in a recent change enacted by the ATO, directors are no...
21 March, 2022