In Brief

In a recent case the majority of the High Court held that news outlets can be considered publishers of comments posted:

  1. by third parties (members of the public); and
  2. under articles on the news site’s Facebook page;

for the purpose of defamation law.

Although arguably this has been the case for some time, the High Court decision has focused attention again on defamation laws when posting on social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Linkedin etc).

Why did the Court make this decision?

The Court held that:

  1. Any act of participation in the communication of defamatory matter to a third party may be sufficient to make a person a publisher.
  2. An administrator of the Facebook page could “hide” comments until they had been reviewed and then un-hidden if approved.
  3. The news outlets encouraged the comments - the number of comments is an important aspect of the Facebook page because it increases the profile and popularity of the page - in turn increasing the readership of the news site and their revenue.

The news sites had the ability to review and prevent from being seen by the public any defamatory comments.

Practical tips for users of social media

  1. If comments are not important for your business and can be turned off on your webpage / social media site – turn them off.
  2. If you have the ability to hide comments until they are reviewed by you – you should enliven this feature and carefully review comments before they can be seen.
  3. If you cannot hide comments on the social media platform you are using, then review the comments regularly and quickly delete any which may be considered defamatory.

It is also important to understand what constitutes defamation. My article at the link below outlines 6 things you need to know about defamation.

Six things you need to know about defamation

In the judgment of Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller; Nationwide News Pty Limited v Voller; Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Voller [2021] HCA 27

About the Author

Catherine Ballantyne

A business disputes specialist, Catherine is a trusted advisor to businesses and individuals in obtaining successful outcomes. Businesses rely on Catherine as a trusted advisor as well as lawyer in guiding them through complex litigation and disputes.

Latest Knowledge

Update on Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination

Update on Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination

On 15 October 2021, the Chief Health Officer (CHO) issued the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination (Workers) Directions (No 3) (Directions) under the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 (Vic). The Directions expand the workers-specific definitions under Schedule 1. This paper provides...
18 October, 2021

Can employers make the COVID-19 vaccination mandatory for staff?

There are many different issues raised by this question so there is no ‘one size fits all’ answer. Guidance on mandating COVID-19 vaccinations from the Fair Work Ombudsman[1] and Safe Work Australia[2] has evolved considerably and we expect that to...
11 October, 2021
Statutory demands and proving solvency

Statutory demands and proving solvency

The recent Victorian Supreme Court case is a reminder of the high threshold required to prove solvency when faced with a statutory demand.
8 October, 2021